<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future Of Ammunition?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realmil.com/the-future-of-ammunition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realmil.com/the-future-of-ammunition/</link>
	<description>Military News, Games, Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:21:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: PredatorBaby</title>
		<link>http://www.realmil.com/the-future-of-ammunition/#comment-13327</link>
		<dc:creator>PredatorBaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realmil.com/?p=3490#comment-13327</guid>
		<description>How neat!  40% is a huge difference in the amount of ammo soldiers could carry.  I hope there&#039;s plans to do the same with other sizes of ammunition, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How neat!  40% is a huge difference in the amount of ammo soldiers could carry.  I hope there&#8217;s plans to do the same with other sizes of ammunition, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 391/392 objects using memcached

Served from: www.realmil.com @ 2013-05-24 01:10:54 -->